Low-carbon information quality dimensions and random forest algorithm evaluation model in digital marketing
Agnew, M. D., Pettifor, H. & Wilson, C. Lifestyle, an integrative concept: Cross-disciplinary insights for low-carbon research. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ.12(6). (2023).
Díaz-Padilla, V. T., Travar, I., Acosta-Rubio, Z. & Parra-López, E. Tourism competitiveness versus sustainability: Impact on the world economic forum model using the. Rasch Methodol. Sustain.15(18), 13700. (2023).
Google Scholar
Jain, P., Chou, M. C., Fan, F. & Santoso, M. P. Embedding sustainability in the consumer goods innovation cycle and enabling tools to measure progress and capabilities. Sustainability13(12), 6662. (2021).
Google Scholar
Wei, J., Zhang, L., Yang, R. & Song, M. A new perspective to promote sustainable low-carbon consumption: The influence of informational incentive and social influence. J. Environ. Manag.327, 116848. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Li, Y. & Geng, Y. Digital economy: an innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.96, 106821. (2022).
Google Scholar
Denga, E. M., Vajjhala, N. R. & Rakshit, S. The role of digital marketing in achieving sustainable competitive advantage. Digit. Transform. Int. Strateg. Organ. 44–60. (2022).
Lewis, J. I. & Nemet, G. F. Assessing learning in low carbon technologies: Toward a more comprehensive approach. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change12(5), e730. (2021).
Google Scholar
Miguel, A. & Miranda, S. The role of digital platforms in promoting pro-sustainable behavior and conscious consumption by brands. Ecocycles9(2), 37–48. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, S., Jahanger, A. & Hossain, M. R. Does China’s low-carbon city pilot intervention limit electricity consumption? An analysis of industrial energy efficiency using time-varying DID model. Energy Econ.121, 106636. (2023).
Google Scholar
Castro-Santa, J., Drews, S. & Bergh, J. Nudging low-carbon consumption through advertising and social norms. J. Behav. Exp. Econ.102, 101956. (2023).
Wang, T., Shen, B., Springer, C. H. & Hou, J. What prevents us from taking low-carbon actions? A comprehensive review of influencing factors affecting low-carbon behaviors. Energy Res. Social. Sci.71, 101844. (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Duan, C., Cui, Y. & Qin, R. Consumers’ attitudes toward low-carbon consumption based on a computational model: Evidence from China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.186, 122119. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. A data-driven approach to objective evaluation of urban low carbon development performance. J. Clean. Prod.368, 133238. (2022).
Wang, R. Y. & Strong, D. M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Manag. Inform. Syst.12(4), 5–33. (1996).
Google Scholar
Del Rio, D. D. F., Sovacool, B. K. & Griffiths, S. Culture, energy and climate sustainability, and smart home technologies: A mixed methods comparison of four countries. Energy Clim. Change2, 100035. (2021).
Cheng, X., Wu, F., Li, W., Yang, J. & Long, R. What maintains low-carbon consumption behaviors: Evidence from China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.189, 114050. (2024).
Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S. & Bronnenberg, B. J. Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci.25, 329–346. (1997).
Google Scholar
Sağkaya Güngör, A. & Ozansoy Çadırcı, T. Understanding digital consumer: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud.46(5), 1829–1858. (2022).
Google Scholar
Hofacker, C., Golgeci, I., Pillai, K. G. & Gligor, D. M. Digital marketing and business-to-business relationships: A close look at the interface and a roadmap for the future. Eur. J. Market.54(6), 1161–1179. (2020).
Xu, Y. & Li, C. M. Digital transformation, firm boundaries, and market power: Evidence from china’s listed companies. Systems11(9), 479. (2023).
Sanbella, L., Van Versie, I. & Audiah, S. Online marketing strategy optimization to increase sales and e-commerce development: An integrated approach in the digital age. Startupreneur Bus. Digit.3(1), 54–66. (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Suo, X. K., Du, X. H., Wu, H. Q. & Lin, H. Corporate digital innovation and stock price crash risk. Finance Res. Lett.66, Article 105690. (2024).
Yang, R. Q. & Jiang, H. C. Digital marketing management control system based on blockchain under the internet background. Soft. Comput. (2023).
Google Scholar
Chintalapati, S. & Pandey, S. K. Artificial intelligence in marketing: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Market Res.64(1), 38–68. (2022).
Google Scholar
Varzaru, A. A. Assessing digital transformation acceptance in public organizations’ marketing. Sustainability15(1), Article 265. (2023).
Sahli, A. & Lichy, J. The role of augmented reality in the customer shopping experience. Int. J. Organ. Anal. (2024).
Google Scholar
Jocevski, M. Blurring the lines between physical and digital spaces: Business model innovation in retailing. Calif. Manag. Rev.63(1), 99–117. (2020).
Google Scholar
Bradač Hojnik, B. & Huđek, I. Small and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age: Understanding characteristics and essential demands. Information14(11), 606. (2023).
Google Scholar
Peng, H., Bumailikaimu, S. & Feng, T. The power of market: venture capital and enterprise digital transformation. North Am. J. Econ. Finance74, Article 102218. (2024).
Dahiya, R. & Gayatri A research paper on digital marketing communication and consumer buying decision process: An empirical study in the Indian passenger car market. J. Global Mark.31(2), 73–95. (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, J., Kang, S. & Lee, K. H. Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles. J. Bus. Res.130, 552–563. (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wu, D. L. & Zeng, Y. M. Digital economy, market segmentation and carbon emission performance. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2023).
Google Scholar
Surbakti, F. P. S., Wang, W., Indulska, M. & Sadiq, S. Factors influencing effective use of big data: A research framework. Inf. Manag.57(1), 103146. (2020).
Google Scholar
Bovee, M., Srivastava, R. P. & Mak, B. A conceptual framework and belief-function approach to assessing overall information quality. Int. J. Intell. Syst.18(1), 51–74. (2003).
Google Scholar
Rane, N. L., Achari, A. & Choudhary, S. P. Enhancing customer loyalty through quality of service: Effective strategies to improve customer satisfaction, experience, relationship, and engagement. Int. Res. J. Modernization Eng. Technol. Sci.5(5), 427–452. (2023).
Google Scholar
Lăzăroiu, G., Neguriţă, O., Grecu, I., Grecu, G. & Mitran, P. C. Consumers’ decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions. Front. Psychol.11, 890. (2020).
Google Scholar
Godoy, M. P., Rusu, C., Hatibovic, F., Granollers, T. & Ugalde, J. Addressing information consumer experience through a user-centered information management system in a Chilean university. Sustainability15 (22), Article 15998. (2023).
Kim, H. & Niehm, L. S. The impact of website quality on information quality, value, and loyalty intentions in apparel retailing. J. Interact. Mark.23(3), 221–233 (2009). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429293276-3
Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A. & Bala, H. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 21–54. (2013).
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M. & Sinclair, J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav.102, 67–86. (2020).
Google Scholar
Du, H. L. S., Xu, J. H., Tang, H. & Jiang, R. X. Repurchase intention in online knowledge service: The brand awareness perspective. J. Comput. Inform. Syst.62(1), 174–185. (2022).
Google Scholar
Naim, A. & Alahmari, F. Reference model of e-learning and quality to establish interoperability in higher education systems. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn.15(2), 15–28. (2020).
Google Scholar
Struijk, M., Angelopoulos, S., Ou, C. X. & Davison, R. M. Navigating digital transformation through an information quality strategy: Evidence from a military organization. Inform. Syst. J.33(4), 912–952. (2023).
Google Scholar
Rai, A., Tang, X., Yin, Z. & Du, S. Gaining customer loyalty with tracking information quality in B2B logistics. J. Manag. Inform. Syst.39(2), 307–335. (2022).
Google Scholar
Alterkait, M. A. & Alduaij, M. Y. Impact of information quality on satisfaction with e-learning platforms: Moderating role of instructor and learner quality. SAGE OPEN14(1), Article 21582440241233400. (2024).
Cao, Q., Zhou, Y., Du, H., Ren, M. & Zhen, W. Carbon information disclosure quality, greenwashing behavior, and enterprise value. Front. Psychol.13, 892415. (2022).
Google Scholar
Zha, D., Zhang, C., Jiang, P. & Wang, F. What makes energy consumption behavior visible? Conceptualization, scale development and validation of customized information feedback. J. Bus. Res.182, 114761. (2024).
Google Scholar
Mills, J., Bonner, A. & Francis, K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. Int. J. Qual. Methods5(1), 25–35. (2006).
Google Scholar
Lin, W., Wu, Z., Lin, L., Wen, A. & Li, J. An ensemble random forest algorithm for insurance big data analysis. IEEE Access5, 16568–16575. (2017).
Google Scholar
Gustavsson, E. & Elander, I. Behaving clean without having to think green? Local eco-technological and dialogue-based, low-carbon projects in Sweden. J. Urban Technol.24(1), 93–116. (2017).
Google Scholar
Sturges, J. E. & Hanrahan, K. J. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Res.4(1), 107–118. (2004).
Google Scholar
Hurwitz, L. B. et al. Content analysis across new media platforms: Methodological considerations for capturing media-rich data. New. Media Soc.20(2), 532–548. (2018).
Google Scholar
Roumeliotis, K. I. & Tselikas, N. D. A machine learning python-based search engine optimization audit software. In Informatics10(3), 68. (2023).
Pamulaparty, L., Rao, C. G. & Rao, M. S. Critical review of various near-duplicate detection methods in web crawl and their prospective application in drug discovery. Int. J. BioMed. Eng. Technol.25(2–4), 212–226. (2017).
Google Scholar
Sun, J. Improving Quality of Programming and Software Through Knowledge Graph Construction and Application. Doctoral dissertation (The Australian National University, 2023). https://www.proquest.com/openview/5b5e3c1260a05ccb1313dace42759240
Peters, H. C. A-methodological saturation: A grounded theory analysis. Couns. Psychol.51(7), 933–969. (2023).
Google Scholar
Biau, G. & Scornet, E. A random forest guided tour. Test25, 197–227. (2016).
Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Aga, D., Pruden, A., Zhang, L. & Vikesland, P. Data analytics for environmental science and engineering research. Environ. Sci. Technol.55(16), 10895–10907. (2021).
Google Scholar
Jantunen, E., Campos, J., Sharma, P. & McKay, M. Open source analytics solutions for maintenance. In 5th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), vol. 8, 688–693. (IEEE, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394819.
Yin, Y., Alqahtani, Y., Feng, J. H., Chakraborty, J. & McGuire, M. P. Classification of eye tracking data in visual information processing tasks using convolutional neural networks and feature engineering. SN Comput. Sci.2, 1–26. (2021).
Google Scholar
Kadiyala, A. & Kumar Applications of python to evaluate the performance of bagging methods. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy37(5), 1555–1559. (2018).
Google Scholar
Farnaaz, N. & Jabbar, M. A. Random forest modeling for network intrusion detection system. Procedia Comput. Sci.89, 213–217. (2016).
Google Scholar
Yin, H. et al. A deep learning-based data-driven approach for predicting mining water inrush from coal seam floor using micro-seismic monitoring data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zermane, A., Tohir, M. Z. M., Zermane, H., Baharudin, M. R. & Yusoff, H. M. Predicting fatal fall from heights accidents using random forest classification machine learning model. Saf. Sci.159, 106023. (2023).
Google Scholar
Yin, H. T., Wen, J. & Chang, C. P. Going green with artificial intelligence: The path of technological change towards the renewable energy transition. Oecon. Copernic.14(4), 1059–1095. (2023).
Google Scholar
Lăzăroiu, G. et al. Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability12(5), 2110. (2020).
Google Scholar
Bai, T. et al. Paths to low-carbon development in China: The role of government environmental target constraints. Oecon. Copernic.14(4), 1139–1173. (2023).
Google Scholar
link
